On Monday 11 February 2013, Benjamin Poulain wrote: > One of the differences is the way the Qt port works. Instead of using the > JSC binding APIs, it uses its own JS Qt bindings. > Would it be possible for Qt to move to the common code? It would make > future refactoring easier as there would be one less difference to care > about. > I guess that would be possible, and if you continue to add more testrunner methods using continuation passing style, we may need to, since I do not think we currently have an easy way to pass a method through the Qt bindings.
That said, Qt has the most convinient interface of all the DRT implementations with the bindings automatically derived from the C++ declarations. I would hate to see that go, and since adding a method to Qt DRT is just adding the C++ method and nothing else, it is no worse than adding an empty implementation to all the ports that are using the common code. `Allan _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
