14.01.2011, 21:38, "Benjamin Poulain" <benjamin.poul...@nokia.com>: > On 01/14/2011 07:30 PM, ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >>> Long term QtWebKit will depends on QtScript for the bridge. To avoid >>> inconsistencies and regressions, I think it would be more reasonable to >>> guard the functions of the bridge with #ifndef QT_NO_SCRIPT. >> Do you mean it's OK to disable whole class QtInstance? (AFAIU, its main >> method is getQtInstance, and from your words it should be disabled) > > Yep, #ifdef the public methods, and do not compile the classes of the > bridge.
I've submitted https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52469 But Simon does not like this idea. Or have I misunderstood something? -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
