Hi Florian, Andrea, all, let me restate what I wrote on the marketing list - perhaps it helps to solve this problem:
Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Florian Effenberger wrote: > > Andrea Pescetti wrote on 2011-08-05 10:30: > >> minimal and straightforward: use the same license > >> indication in http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ and in the > >> page footer, i.e., remove the wrong "(or later)" from the text. > > > > hm, I'm not sure, but didn't we have this "or later" paragraph for new > > contributions? Wasn't it a combination of LGPLv3 or later and the MPL? > > See the issue as: > - The text of http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ reads "LGPLv3 > (or later)" > - The footer of the same page reads "LGPLv3". > - Being different, at least one of them is wrong. I wrote: I agree to your statement that "LGPL 3 (or later)" is not the license the present LibreOffice product is released under. I'd replace "LGPL 3 (or later)" by "As parts of our code have been licensed under LGPL 3, the full binaries have to be released under this license, even if we aim to LGPL 3 (or later) and MPL in future." Best regards Bernhard -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
