Hi Christoph, *,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Christoph Noack <christ...@dogmatux.com> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.10.2011, 14:10 +0200 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
>> Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-09-26 01:12:
>> > as many are german, I share what I immeadiately thought of:
>> > http://drehscheibe.libreoffice.org/bugs?version=3.4.3&os=win64
>> > and
>> > http://drehscheibe.libreoffice.org/support?version=3.4.3&os=linx86
>> >
>> > an english equivalent that has the additional benefit of being shorter
>> > would be "hub"
>> >
>> > so I'd propose
>> > http://hub.libreoffice.org/<type>[?paramenters]
>
> Two comments:
> * It should be possible to have more than one link from within
> LibreOffice -> e.g. extensions, templates, bugs, feedback,
> ordering coffee, ...
Yes, that's covered, the initial part of the URL would reflect that,
in the above example the "type" string.
i.e. hub.libreoffice.org/extensions[?parameters]
hub.libreoffice.org/templates{?parameters] etc.
> * The maintenance effort should be low - I don't know if the
> current idea means to manually add redirects for each published
> version.
No - simplest is to create "versioned" pages as necessary and evaluate
the URL parameters either using javascript on the client or with php
on the server - both are simple to implement.
In case there is no match, just hand out the current/default page as
if no parameters were given.
> * It should also work for "derivatives" or non-TDF builds. Working
> means that we should be able to guide the user to a page that
> explains why its not working / what's the alternative.
How to do that is a matter of policy / how likely it is to encounter
such an URL from outside LibreOffice for example. If such an URL is
frequently used, then it is bothersome to use
hub.libreoffice.org/whatever?derivate=fedora
it would then be easier to have a lik
hub.libreoffice.org/whatever-fedora for example.
But that's a detail, my main concern was to have one single domainname
instead of 20.
>> indeed, you raise very valid points here, and I am in favor of your
>> solution - thanks for bringing this up!
>>
>> Would "hub" be a name acceptable for everyone? Alternatively, we can
>> also use the more technical term of "redirect", in case we want to
>> reserve the name "hub" for some future items.
>
> Yes, redirect is fine for me ... personally, I never heard "hub" for
> that (might just disclose my non-knowledge *g*).
I was thinking about airport hub, like a central airport that connects
many routes (Verkehrsknotenpunkt) - or the center of a wheel (Nabe)
where the individual spokes (Speichen) are connected with each other.
ciao
Christian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
