Hi Nino! Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 22:50 +0100 schrieb Nino Novak: > Christoph, > > while I see your arguments, please try to see the problems with messed > up pages.
I never messed up a page in the OpenOffice.org Wiki by using the rich-text editor. So why? :-) > So you save minutes to have better formatted tables while imposing hours > of work to others who have to fix broken pages. > > (I'm exaggerating a bit, I know, but please see the point I want to > make.) Sorry, I don't see a valid point. Volker referred to Manuel in a previous mail "misuse of the so-called FCKEditor can lead to these mistakes". So it ends up being technological imperfection, nothing more. Those limitations can be addressed by better processes or better tooling. > As for me, the people contributing most to the wiki [1] should decide. > And they should also decide who is in charge to fix broken pages ;-) >From my point-of-view, I'd rater like to talk about content being added and improved - instead of limiting the capabilities for the editors. But however, the rich-text editor is still there ... so I don't complain (too much) *g* Cheers, Christoph -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
