Please use wget-patches for submitting patches, not for general
discussion about Wget features.
"Christian Fraenkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought a lot about wget lately and came up with some ideas(you
> could also call it a personal roadmap). I would like to try
> implement these ideas, too. I just wanted to ask for your oppinions
> about these ideas.
>
> longtime goal: make wget a real daemon.
Maybe I'm missing something.
Wget is designed to be a useful command-line tool. I would love it to
become more useful for the users, but this doesn't really sound like
an improvement. What's the point of Wget being a daemon?
