Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about aother check, use random() if available, otherwise rand() > if available, otherwise your barebone generator ? On the other hand, > for what it is used currently probably there isn't the need for that > complication.
Exactly. If there is a function that is available on all the applicable platforms, I'd like to use it and get rid of my generator and the check entirely. So, does anyone know about the portability of rand()?
