Also sprach James Graham: > > I think you make a compelling case for adding math to HTML the simple > > way. Personally, I'm open to adding it to HTML5. How much would it add > > to the specification? > > I remain sceptical about this. However, if there is a serious effort to > replace > MathML I believe the resulting language must fulfil the following > requirements:
The goal is not to replace MathML. At this point there isn't much to replace -- MathML isn't found in HTML in the wild. Aslo, at the spec level, I believe the two can co-exist just like WebForms and XForms can co-exist. I agree with your other points, though -- nice list. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.opera.com/howcome