On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote: > > From: Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > A missing </option> implies non-conformance but no parse error per 9.1 > > > and 9.2 respectively. > > > > <option> and other form controls aren't yet really part of the > > specification, and are missing all over the place. I added these to the > > syntax section for you, [...] > > FWIW... </option> may also be omitted if the next sibling is an optgroup > element.
Hm. Actually an <optgroup> start tag has to imply an </optgroup> end tag for compatibility with browsers... spec fixed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'