On Jan 31, 2008, at 03:01, Charles wrote:
Semantically, you don't want web video (regardless of format) to be markedup as <video>?
What would be the benefit of instantiating the Flash Player with <video>? Wouldn't it just be less compatible than <object>/<embed>?
(Also, since <video> isn't a video player player, I think instantiating Flash Player with it wouldn't even be semantically pure.)
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/