On Jan 31, 2008, at 03:01, Charles wrote:

Semantically, you don't want web video (regardless of format) to be marked
up as <video>?


What would be the benefit of instantiating the Flash Player with <video>? Wouldn't it just be less compatible than <object>/<embed>?

(Also, since <video> isn't a video player player, I think instantiating Flash Player with it wouldn't even be semantically pure.)

--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/


Reply via email to