Pentasis schrieb:
This I understand, and I can even sympathise with it. However, I do hope that at least "they" will take this issue seriously and at least try to build in something that will enable "us" to work on that part of the spec independantly later on. I still think that the semantic part has very, very little to do with the technical side of the spec. so somewhere the two should be able to split up.
I am not sure whether I understand you correctly... Of course the practical use of a specification lies in its technical implementations, or do you disagree with that? You are free to specify your own markup language, but it will be useless if there is no kind of mechanism to interpret the documents marked up that way. So I don't understand how the technical side could be split away.
