On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Chris DiBona<cdib...@gmail.com> wrote: > At this point I feel like we're giving open source advice to teams > outside of Google, which is beyond our mission. We're comfortable with > our compliance mission and feel it is accurate and correct. Other > companies and people need to make their own decisions about > compliance.
There may be a real legal problem here, but I don't think it matters much. An LGPL loophole via naming in licenses--whatever. I'm sure there are resources available to license or rewrite whatever you need if that falls through. The incredibly sucky outcome is that Chrome ships patent-encumbered "open web" features, just like Apple. That is reprehensible. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."