On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Chris Double <chris.dou...@double.co.nz> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Mike Shaver <mike.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...I would probably suggest that the >> developers of said browser implement basic Ogg support (enough to say >> "this is Ogg, so we don't support it"), and go back to solving more >> pressing problems! > > Or the developers of said browser could obey the mime type that the > server sent,
My understanding is that this isn't working out so well for us. Mike