On 12/15/11 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Whether it's<wbr> or<nobr> that gets defined in terms that violate CSS, the result is the same as far as I can tell.
Fair. We may need changes or extensions to CSS if nothing else works.
If we make a change here it seems better to move towards just specifying everything in terms of CSS, e.g. as the suggestion in my last e-mail on this thread. The question really is whether that CSS-only solution is a plausible way forward or if it has problems I haven't thought of.
It seems plausible to me; we should run it by Elika. -Boris
