On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Marcos Caceres <w...@marcosc.com> wrote: > The reason I didn't make it a boolean was because of the IPC involved and > because I wanted to support multiple types of locks without needing to add > new attributes in the future (and if we need to add the complex stuff later).
What's the problem with adding more attributes in the future? That said, I do think that a "timeout" for screen locks make sense, so a boolean wouldn't work. Though not as a timeout for when to release the lock, but rather as a "minimum time I'd like to keep the screen awake" as described at http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2014-August/297423.html / Jonas
