On 11/09/2015 00:11, "Ian Hickson" <i...@hixie.ch> wrote:
>(Please don't cross-post to the WHATWG list -- either post to the WHATWG >list, or post to other lists, but not both at the same time. It causes >threads to fragment as people aren't on all the lists.) Noted - in this case it's not a classic cross-post: TTWG was copied for archive purposes to maintain a record of the fulfilment of the action to send to WHATWG; there's no expectation that TTWG members will attempt to reply back to WHATWG. >On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote: >> >> We think an HTML cue as a variant of the third option is the best >> solution. > >If you do this please make sure to define in detail how it should all >work. Are you commenting that it is not a bad proposal in principle, given extra detail, or that it is not a proposal that can be assessed at all with the current level of detail? >For example, what happens if a script running inside a cue does >"history.back()"? What happens if an auto-playing video element in a cue >is given a URL that points to a resource that requires HTTP >authentication? Is each cue a separate Document? What happens to media >queries in a cue? Thank you for these questions - I will forward them back to TTWG for consideration. >These questions are but the tip of a very, very large iceberg. > >-- >Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL >http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. >Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
