On 2016-07-14 18:21, Domenic Denicola wrote: >> From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of >> i...@hansschmucker.de > >> _The remaining issue for me seems that the interaction between this "viewer" >> and the page is completely unspecified and that items like descriptions and >> copyright notices which may be required to make sense of an image may or may >> not be shown._ >> >> _ Also, an image may represent an item of any kind or offer actions on it >> (for example "Download the PDF", "View the subgallery", "Show related >> images", "Go to full description"), which the page may be unable to perform >> if there is no standardized way to interact with the UA._ > > I don't think the below proposal is a good way to address this. I'd suggest > creating your own library to implement the desired functionality, possibly > using microformats for the semantic aspects, and seeing if it gets adoption. > If it becomes very popular, maybe we could consider asking implementers if > they are interested in adding it to the platform, like they have done with > aspects of other popular libraries such as jQuery. But I think you are still > too quick to jump to asking implementers to implement a new element.
agree --- Delfi Ramirez -- At Work My digital signature [1] 0034 633 589231 del...@segonquart.net [2] twitter: @delfinramirez [3] IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart [4] http://segonquart.net http://delfiramirez.info [5] Links: ------ [1] http://delfiramirez.info/public/dr_public_key.asc [2] mail:%20del...@segonquart.net [3] https://twitter.com/delfinramirez [4] skype:segonquart [5] http://delfiramirez.info
