Hi Jane,
You completely missed my point. This is about galleries and categories,
not about creator, institution, etc etc. That's all next phase. Please
reread my original post.
Maarten
Op 12-8-2013 20:32, Jane Darnell schreef:
geocoordinates can be linked to places; creator templates, book
templates, and artwork templates can all be linked to people.
The problem is if you store the data on WikiData, but do not allow the
content to show up on WikiCommons (due to copyright problems), then
where does data-curation take place?
After I sent that email it occurred to me though that probably most,
if not all the people on Commons who understand this stuff are already
Wikidatans anyway. So maybe it's a moot point.
2013/8/12, Cristian Consonni <kikkocrist...@gmail.com>:
2013/8/11 Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com>:
Hmm, I am not quite sure how to see this. Places and people yes: It
would be nice to have the geo coordinates on Wikidata and for the
artist and writers
I am not sure I get what geocoordinates means for people.
I also agree for the book and the artwork templates.
But how could you possibly move all of the Commons copyright logic? As
far as I know, it's really quite a small group of people who even
understand how all that stuff works on Commons and can untangle those
template categories and delete/keep workflows... if you open Wikidata
to keeping the data on copyrighted materials, like books and artworks,
is that metadata OK to move and manage there?
I think this was not the sense of Maarten's proposal.
Cristian
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
