Here's a very rough first attempt:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Comprehensive_groups_of_items

The main problem is that other than the areas I've been working in, I
really don't know what's out there :-). Does the Wiki Loves Monuments
work mean that we have complete monument coverage in certain
countries, for example?

Andrew.

On 11 March 2015 at 15:01, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> Thanks both. I'll try hacking out an aggregated list tonight and send
> the link around, but for now if there's anything you know for sure we
> cover comprehensively, fire away with your suggestions :-)
>
> Mix-and-match was in the back of my head, as it has a nice example of
> all three groups:
>
> * Already completely included - MEPs (at least until the next election), ODNB
>
> * Going to be included but not there yet - Dictionary of Welsh Biography
>
> * Will never be completely included - ACAD
>
> Andrew.
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 14:31, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I can offer
>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/
>>
>> This (or a future successor) could serve as the "list keeper" for, say, list
>> of lighthouses, or graded buildings in the UK.
>>
>> One thing that IMHO would be required for this to work would be a
>> (semi-)automatic sync of the "list keeper" with authoritative external lists
>> (unless we want to sync those to Wikidata directly).
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:09 PM Markus Krötzsch
>> <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> This is a great idea! It would help data consumers to know what to
>>> expect and community members to know what to put in (or where help with
>>> imports would be appreciated). Moreover, the discussion about this list
>>> would be a great way to structure our work in general (have documented
>>> discussions about our goals for certain types of data). I feel that the
>>> bot right approval process is not the best place to decide if we strive
>>> to have all streets or all lighthouses in.
>>>
>>> For things that are not complete in Wikidata (yet or ever), it would
>>> further help to provide pointers to other, more complete data sources
>>> (and the properties we might have to link to them).
>>>
>>> The question is how to best organise this list. Your initial example
>>> setup already shows that this tends to become very diverse (not to say:
>>> chaotic). One could link this from the related class items (e.g.,
>>> lighthouses or paintings), but having this as another extra load on the
>>> talk page would maybe not so ideal either. After all, this could be one
>>> of the first things that newbies to Wikidata want to get an idea about.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Markus
>>>
>>> On 11.03.2015 14:07, Andrew Gray wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > I wonder if it would be useful to have a centralised list of "classes
>>> > of things in Wikidata". For example:
>>> >
>>> > Things entirely in Wikidata
>>> >
>>> > * MEPs
>>> > * County-level administrative divisions of all countries
>>> > * All artworks by the following people (list)
>>> > * Cultural heritage sites in the following countries (list)
>>> > * All people listed in the following biographical databases (list)
>>> > * (etc)
>>> >
>>> > Things not yet entirely in Wikidata (but probably will be eventually)
>>> >
>>> > * All national-level elected representatives
>>> > * All species
>>> > * Lighthouses
>>> > * All artworks by the following people (list)
>>> > * Cultural heritage sites in the following countries (list)
>>> > * All people listed in the following biographical databases (list)
>>> >
>>> > Things which will never be complete in Wikidata
>>> >
>>> > * All local politicians
>>> > * Streets worldwide
>>> > * All businesses
>>> >
>>> > This would be a very useful adjunct to the notability page, as it
>>> > would give concrete examples to work from for the sort of things we
>>> > feel are appropriate.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - Andrew Gray
>   andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk



-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to