2009/9/9 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: > 2009/9/9 <wjhon...@aol.com>:
>> I really don't see this as IAR. >> It seems the argument is that it's firmly BLP policy. That for some >> reason (inexplicable apparently), keeping the name of a kipnap victim >> secret, helps them to not be killed. Personally the argument seems >> flat to me. But at any rate, if we were to have a discussion on >> finding consensus, I would expect it to revolve around BLP. > BLP talks about removing unverifiable harmful information about living > people, it doesn't say verifiable harmful information should be > removed (unless it is given undue weight). That's the point - it's entirely in order to be very conservative in what's accepted as verification of such. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
