Ray Saintonge wrote: > stevertigo wrote: > >> More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with >> adjudicating policy and sections therein. >> >> >> > > That can't work without opening up the broader question of how policies > are formulated and later amended. Any kind of policy review process > needs to operate separately from Arbcom, and be able to rule whether > policies were properly adopted. Until such a process is fully > operational nothing useful would be accomplished by having Arbcom rule > on those policies. > OK, here's an old-style formulation: X is to current policy and policy-review discussions as RfAr is to the Workshop. What would X be?
It would be some sort of policy review that operated to a schematic, with things like "in fewer than 500 words" for submissions, and so on. And it would not be a free-for-all or brainstorming session. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
