Matt Jacobs wrote: > I see nothing unwiki-like in suggesting that a person should defend their > additions to an article when disputes arise. That's a pretty standard > expectation in any collaborative environment. There's no lack of assumption > of good faith involved in an editor removing an addition if they have reason > to believe it is not beneficial to the article. > But if they remove it from a generally anti-spam ideological point of view, or on the grounds of "conflict of interest", then there is such a problem of good faith being disregarded. Quiddity has now gone into this in greater detail, and WP:EL is _very clearly_ drafted from an anti-spam perspective.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l