Fred Bauder wrote: > You can go back to the > early history of the article "reality" a little article I created March > 11, 2002: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reality&oldid=27840 > > At a certain point Larry will chime in... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reality&diff=356398&oldid=356321 > > His comment is typical of him in arrogant mode, "Start on an actual > article on this subject, with further explanation as to why the former > article didn't really concern the topic" as he removes all prior content > and substitutes his view. > > You see, what he taught sophomores in his Intro to Philosophy class > trumps all other content. Note the complete absence of any reference. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reality&oldid=356398 > > At least the intro to the current article is not bad. Not an easy > subject, but certainly one that concerns material outside the discipline > of philosophy. Not long after this he wanted to ban me, but Jimbo vetoed > him. > [[User:Larry Sanger/Larry's Text]] was still causing trouble a year later. I think the distinction between "serious" and "solemn" is useful in dealing with "serious academics".
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l