Nihiltres wrote: > <snip> > I strongly believe that showing very prominently the level of review a given > article—or even a given *revision* thereof—has received, and the perceived > level of quality involved, is a good thing. The Wikipedia 1.0 assessment > system (Stub, Start, C, B, A, GA, FA…) seems to serve as a decent start for > that sort of thing. If we are honest with ourselves, we would admit that we really need levels 1 to 10 for articles. It seems already to be hard to get an A, fairly much impossible to get GA for an "average" topic, and as we know only 1 in 1000 is FA (in round terms). And "expert review" = FA+ is another quite defensible level. I think cutting to the chase, setting substub = 1 and reviewed FA = 10 might be a great timesaver, and help a process in which less "mystique" attached to the whole business. Rebooting with FA = 9 sounds quite fun.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l