> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:57, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: >> If there weren't any anti-scientology campaigners spreading the word >> about >> Xenu, we'd still have a reason to have an article about Xenu. If there >> was >> no >> anti-Santorum campaign, we'd have no reason for the article--its entire >> existence depends directly on that campaign. >> > > Yes, but there *is* such a campaign. > > If there weren't a tea party movement, we wouldn't have an article on > the tea party movement. > > But there is. So we do. > > If there weren't a neologism named after Mr. Santorum, there wouldn't > be an article on it. > > But there is. So we do. > > -- > Tom Morris > <http://tommorris.org/>
No question the subject is notable. The question is how to handle it appropriately. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
