They say you have to wait 2-5 days for a response after requesting changes as though that is a bad thing. I'm very impressed with that response time. How many commercial encyclopaedias can do better? On Apr 18, 2012 12:48 PM, "David Gerard" <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PR people who edited Wikipedia get crucified. Counterattack: reduce > trust in Wikipedia. > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120417113527.htm > > Paper: http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/ > > The paper's message appears to be "Wikipedia's rules need to change". > (Also, "Jimmy Wsles is a big meanie head.") The paper doesn't address > the problem that the media and general public get upset and turn PR > editing into a PR problem even when it's within existing rules. > > (Aside: I've evidently been skimming too many hard science papers - > that "peer reviewed" paper reads like an undergraduate essay.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
