> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19527797 > > "Author Roth rebukes Wikipedia over Human Stain edit" > > "Following the publication of the New Yorker letter, the Wikipedia > entry was changed and a section noting the debate inserted near its > end." > > Has this been mentioned on any other mailing lists? > > I noticed that the article makes the (very common) error/assumption > that administrators exercise some sort of editorial control, when (in > principle), it is editors that exercise editorial control (when the > editorial process works, that is). Do those dealing with Wikipedia > publicity ever try and correct this misunderstanding, or is it > near-impossible to get the distinction across to journalists? > > Carcharoth
Roth is an elderly man googling, see http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/09/internet-stain-philip-roth-wikipedia-entry/56646/ Our current content seems appropriate. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
