On 1/17/09, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Back in the day, we used to use null edits intentionally to update > pages after templates changed. Now we have the job queue to do that > for us, but it still works as far as I know.
That's nice I know. This does have its uses but there ought to be some way to do this other than the usual get and post. Maybe some kind of &action=null which handles it internally and skips the pre-save transform and any surprises that may create. Something like &action=purge but more thorough (?). —C.W. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
