I may be in the minority - but I like the idea of adding some structure to the naming and logos. It may not matter to those of us already involved, but in trying to engage new people - having three events with very similar purpose but three different names is confusing and sometimes makes us look a bit unorganized.
While it appears no one will be winning popularity contests shepherding this conversation along, I am glad to see it happening. -Greg aka varnent ___________ Sent from my iPad. Apologies for any typos. A more detailed response may be sent later. On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 01/23/2013 03:07 PM, bawolff wrote: >> To be honest making naming requirements sounds like a bikeshed >> discussion. > > I'm sorry it has been perceived by some as such. I started the discussion > after the real need this morning of suggesting a name to a local promoter > willing to organize an event. > > End of discussion at wikitech-l. If anybody is interested please continue at > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Groups/Promotion#Naming_our_developer_events_23068 > > The Promotion group is actually the perfect context for discussions about > names, logos, events and such. If you are interested in these topics please > watch https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups/Promotion and consider joining > the group. > > -- > Quim Gil > Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
