On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Roger Fujii wrote: > lee wrote: > > > > > > At this point, I would like to know if people agree up to this point. > > > > > > Try reading section 2C of the LGPL and tell me how it's good for commercial > > > companies. > > > If LGPL is so clean, simple and nice, why does mozilla/openoffice/apache/perl > > > not use it? > > it would appear thats changing and I hope this isn't duplication ( > > according to mozills site this re-licensing began 9/2001) > > ============= > > > > http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html > > They still don't use it *exclusively*. They are doing this to reconcile the problems > created by the *GPL covered components.
And your point is??? Mozilla _is_ using the LGPL, and it seems to have won over the MPL for whatever reasons. Developers prefer it. Which makes it better. Why should we p*ss against the wind? Just to get wet? -- Dimi.