On October 29, 2002 10:15 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote: > However in this case there are some logical relation between the patches.
Can't argue, hand hurts. But histroy shows that you like to argue for no good reason :). Case in point: [snip expication why you had to do it this way] > OK, this time they might be not so useful to read both since they > are almost 100% percent independant :))) But, IT DOES NOT MATTER if they are dependant. My patches are 99% of the time dependant, and I still send them as separate emails. Do you want me do send an email with 15 patches in them??? If they are depemdant (and that's not obvious), just add a small blurb in the comment section (the one before the ChangeLog). It's that simple. > Why not, instead of complaining to people who doesn't > (or only partly) listens, write some sort of mail "filter" > the reformats the mail to one or more mail of a more > appropriate format. Inline attachments and that sort of things... Oh, come on man, this _is_ silly. You are the only one sending multiple patches per email, for crying out loud! :) -- Dimi.