On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:51:59PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > It does look like distributing the load helps a tiny > bit, but it's not clear it's a big win over just building > on the dual 650MHz machine. > The fastest build I've seen so far is 19 minutes. I'm pretty > sure I'm not doing things optimally yet. > > So how long does it take *you* to do a clean build > (just the 'make' part after 'make depend', say) of > Wine-20021125? On a athlon 900 with 512 MB RAM it takes about 30 minutes for a full build, but only for the first run. On the second run it takes about 3-4 minutes :). Ok, i'm using ccache and it realy paid out during my -DSTRICT work. The cache hit rate had varied between 30% and 80%, depending what i've done. You get 30% - 40% hitrate for normal updates from cvs without doing a "make clean".
> No fair using ccache! That's the next tool I want to investigate;
> it's probably the biggest win of all, at least for regression
> testing.
I've thought about buying a new computer before i started to use ccache.
With ccache i'll wait for the Hammer.
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
msg15497/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
