I'll check at them. fulvio
> -----Original Message----- > From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: venerdi 11 aprile 2003 9.58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] pcap_compile_nopcap > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Dries Decock wrote: > > I've a question about the deprecated fuctions > > The "deprecated" and "discouraged" items in the function list have a > number of problems, which probably need to be cleaned up: > > Unless there's a way to open a "dead" pcap_t with "pcap_open()", > "pcap_open_dead()" cannot be deprecated in favor of > "pcap_open()". > > If "pcap_findalldevs()" is deprecated in favor of > "pcap_findalldevs_ex()", other functions should be deprecated in > favor of "pcap_findalldevs_ex()", not in favor of > "pcap_findalldevs()". > > "pcap_dump()" cannot be used instead of "pcap_file()" - > "pcap_dump()" deals with writing savefiles, while "pcap_file()" > deals with getting at the "FILE *" for the file from which a > savefile is being read. > > "pcap_fileno()" can't be deprecated in general, as it's still > useful on UNIX (and potentially necessary on UNIX, if you're > going to use a "select()"/"poll()" loop), although it > *can* be designated a UNIX-only function (in fact, perhaps it > should be removed from WinPcap, by putting #ifndef WIN32/#endif > around it). > > > ================================================================== > This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > To unsubscribe use > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================================== ================================================================== This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To unsubscribe use mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================================================================