Hello,
Yes, so far they are working great!! We have 2 links installed
and another 10 planed.
We like using integrated units so we do not have to mess with
LMR and taping connectors. However we are not getting the distances we need
with the Integrated. We are going to use integrated on 1 side and
connectorized on the other for links from 7 to 13 miles. This is because a
few of the towers we are on we do not want to put a 2 foot dish on. Beyond
the 13 miles we are planning to use 2 foot dishes on both sides.
The max ERIP limit is kind of funny for the band. Below is a
good link that will help you understand it. We use the max channel size.
http://www.ligowave.com/wiki/index.php/LigoPTP-3_FCC_EIRP_Rules
Ligo is in the process of getting approval for the other part of
the 50mhz in 3.65. Right now we only have 25mHz of the 3.65. This means
that with a channel size of 20mHz you have only 1 channel. We have not
tested putting 2 radios on one tower yet. We plan to vertically separate
them and put one on vertical and one on horizontal, but again we have not
tested that yet.
Hope that helps, I will keep you posted on our testing.
From: motorola-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:motorola-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Motorola Canopy User Group
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: [Motorola II] Ligowave 3.65 Experience?
Anyone has deployed this units?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
