https://fccid.io/SWX-M900/Test-Report/Test-Report-1260212
You can see that it was tested/certified on 5/10/20MHz channels. -Hal On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com> wrote: > We had an issue this week where we had a Power company have a 50K licensed > band at 901.152 Mhz for power meter reading. We have still a few older > links that are 900MHz on Yagi’s to individuals in deep woods. I had to > move channels all over the place as a 902-912MHz 10Mhz channel with UBNT > does not have edge filters that don’t pollute down to 901MHz. So moving to > the middle of the band cleaned up the noise on their license. > > > > Now they are claiming that 10MHz channel width in the 900MHz ISM band is > Illegal. That the channel width is to be no larger than 8MHz. I have read > all kinds of ISM docs from the FCC and I see no mention of max channel > widths. They made mention of talking to the FCC if we didn’t fix the > issue. > > > > Proof they are wrong any one? This is a national company with a $10K Anritsu > analyzer they hired in to find the noise. > > > > *Steve Barnes* > > Wireless Operations Manager > > *New Lisbon Broadband* > > *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>* > > *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>* > > 765-584-2288 ext:1101 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
