Le mardi 31 juillet 2012, Balint Reczey a écrit :

> On 07/31/2012 09:59 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>
>> Le 31 juil. 2012 à 09:43, Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com
>> <mailto:anders.bro...@ericsson.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>  Hi,
>>> Others have to comment on whether we require python or not but it would
>>> be
>>> nice if you attached your script to a bug report so we could have a look
>>> at it
>>> and have a record of it. I think it should be OK to require python 2.6
>>> as the
>>> lowest supported level to make things simpler.
>>> Best regards
>>> Anders
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> just for information the Linux development machine I have at work (Debian
>> Lenny)
>> is still packaging python 2.5 by default (unfortunately). It would be
>> great if
>> we could keep compatibility with older machines.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pascal.
>>
>>  Hi Pascal,
>
> Lenny is oldstable and is not supported even by the Debian Project itself.
> Please upgrade to Squeeze.
>
> Cheers,
> Balint


Hi Balint,

I would be happy to do so but the IT guys do not share my point of vue ;)
For what it is worth, projects like Mercurial SCM (written mostly in
Python) are still maintaining compatibility with Python 2.4.

Regards,
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to