2012/9/26 Anders Broman <a.bro...@bredband.net>
> Pascal Quantin skrev 2012-09-26 19:41:
>
>
>
> 2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio <lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe "container" could be better?
>>
>> Regards
>> Lucio
>>
>>
> Hi Lucio,
>
> thanks for your suggestion, I like it. I will wait a few days to see if
> someone suggests a better wording (or a better approach than my patch
> proposal in bug 2402 comment 10) and then commit it.
>
> Regards,
> Pascal.
>
> For fields like this
> { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01,
> { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
> FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
> "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r5", HFILL }},
> { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_02,
> { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
> FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
> "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r6", HFILL }},
>
> Using the blurb or dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01 should be better than the current
> scheme.
>
Thanks for the suggestion Anders. I will explore using the blurb and
falling back to _container when no blub is available and see what it gives.
Regards,
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
