On 09/01/2013 08:22 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > I don't think that "other window managers do" is a reason to include > code doing exoteric stuff and used once or twice in a lifetime > I guess it is a matter of perspective. Sometimes less is not more, even if it might appear so when having a first superficial look. ;)
I don't think that having some practical function in common with "other window managers" should be considered bloat. It is not a matter of "us" and "them", but rather about common functionality that makes sense in some common usage contexts: Quite a few years in the past (was that SuSE with fvwm?), in case of a crash of the current window manager, I used to like being able starting another window manager in place, thus preserving my currently running work session. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
