On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:56:37 -0000, P.H.Lauke wrote: > And how, in that case, is the use of UL bad ? Sure, UL is > generic, but it does get semantic meaning from its constituent > list items, in this case definition lists. > > Or are we splitting hairs here ?
I think we are splitting hairs, so which ever way you really want to mark it up should be fine. But for the purist's argument... above you said 'definition lists' (plural). This is the difference between the two examples; you've ended up with multiple lists, where originally there was only one :) Lea -- Lea de Groot Elysian Systems ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
