Hi tee,
I still think the <strong> tag is the way to go for you.
In your example you have inline text that you want to make bold and a diff
colour and font.
This *shounds* like you want to strongly emphasis that text. Why not use the
<strong> element to do it?
You can still apply your styles:
<p><strong>Strong</strong> is bold</p>
<style>
strong {
font: 1em bold Arial, san-serif;
text-transform: uppercase;
text-decoration: none;
color: #369;
}
</style>
I'd make the argument that if you still don't want to use the <strong> tag
then at least think of a different name for your class as i think it might
get confusing later on.
Cheers :o)
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: "tee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] 'strong' as class name
Thank you Andy, for the link and reminder.
Note that the second font family is 'sans-serif' (with an 's' and
hyphen).
Should be:
<p><span class="strong">Strong</span> is bold</p>
They are correct in my files. I should have paid more attention in typing
when posting question to the list so to prevent confusion.
FURTHER READING
<
http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/Web-Style-Sheets/CSS-shorthand-at-a-glance/2/ >
Cheers,
tee
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
