> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 7 October 2005 3:09 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] Meta Keywords? > > I'd have to agree with Andreas here. > > Wile for Ranking purposes they're not terribly important, at least > Description is still sometimes used by Search Engines. > > Plus there's the added notion that Meta Tags *in and of > themselves* are a > good thing to put in a page (as any librarian will tell you). > Plus there's > no way of knowing what future technoligies can put these to good use. > In saying that, of course, you'd actually have to think about > making those > meta tags *really* relevent and page-specific - otherwise, > it's just guff.
Nice expression - couldn't have put it better: "guff!" ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
