Patrick's got a good point ... but isn't this conversation just about at its
end?
We seem to have two camps: those for and those against.
How much more do we need to talk about this stuff???
R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] New logo scheme was talking points for standards
Lea de Groot wrote:
http://www.energyrating.gov.au/con3.html
Ugly stickers; Very effective program.
From http://www.energyrating.gov.au/background.html
"Manufacturers who produce / import appliances for the Australian market
are required to submit their products to an approved testing agency."
So, it is effective because:
- it's *enforced* (by law, I'll assume) by the government
- there are *approved* testing agencies
Once those two things are in place on the net, we can discuss stickers and
badges...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
