The following may be of interest to web standards folk who haven't been
keeping up with the HTML Working Group and where HTML5 is headed:
On 4/26/07, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [1]:
There are people strongly arguing
that HTML should be a purely presentational language, much, much more
presentational than the proposed WHATWG draft. In fact, unless someone
argues against it, it's likely that the W3C spec will be even less
semantic and more presentational than the WHATWG draft. So if you
think the WHATWG draft is already too presentational, I really
encourage you to make your opinion known in the HTML working group.
The official instructions for joining the HTML Working Group are at:
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/40318/instructions
Ian Hickson has some clearer instructions at:
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1173385976&count=1
Laura
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Apr/0171.html
Related References:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Apr/0168.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/
___________________________________________
Laura L. Carlson
Information Technology Systems and Services
University of Minnesota Duluth
Duluth, MN U.S.A. 55812-3009
http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
