Hi John

 

Roger Hudson and Russ Weakley did an interested paper on this which explains
the organization of navigation really well:

http://www.usability.com.au/resources/ozewai2005/

 

Cheers,

Gian

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Green
Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2007 5:10 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Screen Reader Accessible Navigation Suggestions

 

Yes that's exactly what I'm suggesting. Our www.accessibility.co.uk website
is an example of that. It doesn't have third level navigation but if it did
I would put another list below the second level navigation. The site is only
about 30 pages so third level menus are not needed, and the few third level
pages are just linked from within the body of second level pages.

 

We have done the same at www.testpartners.co.uk, which has about 60 pages
but don't look at the coding - it's more than 4 years old and in desperate
need of a rewrite.

 

Steve

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Moynihan
Sent: 13 June 2007 19:44
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Screen Reader Accessible Navigation Suggestions

Hi Steve,
Thanks for replying to my posting. 

I am a little confused as to exactly what you are referring to. Are you
saying have a primary navigation for various sections of the website and
then on each secondary page add another list and the same for third level
pages? 

Would you have any links as examples that I can take a look at?

Thanks for your help,

John

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Green
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:50 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Screen Reader Accessible Navigation Suggestions

 

That's not a big site so I would expect that two lists for the primary and
secondary navigation would be sufficient. Use a third list if you need a
third level of navigation. I would advise against nesting the second and
third level navigation lists, which is what people often do. It may be
semantically correct but it makes it difficult for screen reader users to
build a mental model of the navigation because it changes so much from page
to page, and some won't even know what nested lists are. Consistency is key
to a good user experience with a screen reader.

 

Avoid any kind of dropdown menu. There have been many attempts to create
accessible dropdown menus, but they all cause accessibility problems for one
user group or another. Even the best ones rely on non-standard interaction
models in order to achieve good accessibility, which is not really a
solution at all.

 

If you want to provide headings to indicate the primary, secondary and
tertiary menus then you can hide them off screen. They are not essential but
they can help the user build a mental model of the page and they provide
landmarks that aid navigation.

 

Steve

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Moynihan
Sent: 13 June 2007 17:46
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Screen Reader Accessible Navigation Suggestions

Hi Folks,
I was wondering if the group could offer some advice regarding accessible
navigation for a website. I have a website that I'm working on that needs to
be accessible for people who use screen readers such as Jaws. I am kind of
stumped on which type of navigation to utilize since the website has
approximately 110 pages. I can just create a list for the navigation. 

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what would be the best way to set up
the navigation for this site?

Thanks for your help.

John

 

 


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
******************************************************************* 
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to