Tee wrote: > [XStandard] Mac version finally came out - a very long wait, > must be at least 2 year It wasn't a straight port - we were pioneering new accessible UI and few features such as authoring definition lists at the same time as we were writing the OS X code. Whenever you're first to do something, it's always going to take longer. For example, it took us 2 months to build support for authoring definition lists (dl). Initially we thought dl should be authored in a similar way to ol/ul so we spent a month building the authoring interface that way. Then we realized that the user will have a much better experience if dl was treated more like tables from an authoring perspective, so we spent a month re-writing authoring interface. And that's how 2 years go by.
Here is more info: http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4931 http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=7607 Tee wrote: > thread regarding XStandard porting to Modx and you and the > developers were going to see if possible. That seems went dead? We make a special version of XStandard with most of the Pro features available to open source CMS vendors free of charge. Here are the details: http://xstandard.com/en/programs/xstandard-lite-for-partner-cms/ MODx developers started to integrate XStandard into their CMS but we don't know what the current status of that project is. Regards, -Vlad http://xstandard.com XStandard XHTML WYSIWYG Editor -------- Original Message -------- From: Tee G. Peng Date: 2007-09-12 11:02 PM > > On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote: > >> Tee wrote: >>> Personally I don't think there is a fully accessible >>> WYSIWYG Editor existed that delivers pure clean code. >> It all depends on how you define "fully". XStandard has a keyboard >> accessible interface and most definitely delivers clean, accessible >> markup. >> > > > Well, yesterday I finally learned that the Mac version finally came out > - a very long wait, must be at least 2 year; after 6 months of waiting, > I gave up and completely forgotten as if it never existed. Haven't try > the lite version so I will take your word and give a benefit of doubt, > but until then I will reserve my insignificant 2 cents :) > > I remember there was a thread regarding XStandard porting to Modx and > you and the developers were going to see if possible. That seems went dead? > > > tee > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
