Well ... HTML 5 is being developed so XHTML is likely not the future, I was under the impression that you'll also be able to write HTML 5 in XHTML syntax (as XHTML 5, obviously different from XHTML 2 which is a different concept?). This might not be the case of course -- could anyone shed any light on this, or is this still an unknown?
Cheers, David On 14/09/2007, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 13 Sep 2007, at 23:09, S.R. Emerson wrote: > > >> Is there a particular reason you have specified XHTML? > > > > So it is upgradeable for the future. > > Well ... HTML 5 is being developed so XHTML is likely not the future, > converting from HTML 4.01 to XHTML 1.0 isn't difficult anyway, and > Appendix C is something of a pain. I wouldn't look so far to a > possible (and increasingly unlikely) future at the expense of the > present. > > -- > David Dorward > http://dorward.me.uk/ > http://blog.dorward.me.uk/ > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > -- David Little -e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -w: www.littled.net ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
