David, I think you are reading things differently to me. I don't know the authors true intention, but I read his words as being a call for "anyone who wants to see ARIA implemented" to join their team, not necessarily "someone who is on the ARIA team".
I do also agree with the sentiments though - there is an obvious need to treat 'applications' differently from 'content' in quite a number of ways, and at the moment there is not even a way to signal this explicitly. Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of David Dixon Sent: 01 March 2009 14:33 To: li...@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Javascript & Accessibility Interesting blog entry by the creators of the Cappuccino project (http://cappuccino.org) on the subject on Web Accessibility vs JavaScript Availability: http://rossboucher.com/2009/02/26/accessibility-degradation-in-cappuccin o Personally im in favour of the distinction he makes, but the expectation for the WAI ARIA team to contact _them_ to help their framework use it is rather unrealistic although the WAI ARIA team (as with the W3C in general) need to start producing more palatable documentation rather than just having huge technical manuals on the subject. Interested to know others thoughts on the subject. David ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
