Sounds like you're going to a lot of effort to make the IE6 experince worse than it needs to be. Is this *dis*graceful degradation? ;)
David On 20/12/2010, at 1:18 AM, tee <weblis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. I need to look into it and run a few tests. > > I think it may not be a safest approach as I vaguely remember I experienced a > few issue using @import with CSS compression and CSS file merging script. > Script that brings CSS3 selectors for IE such as selectivizr also cannot > handle @import properly - I only tried it once and two style sheets are using > @import but are placed inside a main style sheet. > > tee > > On Dec 18, 2010, at 6:15 AM, G.Sørtun wrote: > >> >>> I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage >>> has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to >>> no special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see >>> an un-styled page as if the style sheet has switch off. >>> >>> Can this be done? >> >> Of course... :-) >> >> How to & demo here: >> <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_50.html> >> >> It is up to you how "unstyled" IE6 shall present a page. I would give it >> "some". >> >> regards >> Georg > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
