I strongly disagree, Mike. Bjorn's suggestion to call it Transmit
Harmonic Prevention is a VERY good one, because it describes what the
choice does. It is NOT "split" in the sense it has been used in ham
radio for at least 70 years.
People learn from things being called what they are. Bjorn's suggestion
teaches. "Split" is wrong, confuses, and teaches nothing.
I do NOT agree with his wording for the three options, and propose they
remain the same.
73, Jim K9YC
On 5/8/2023 6:42 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
That's not the only thing it does so that's not a good choice. Nobody
has every come up with anything better than Split.
Let's just learn that Split from 50 years ago has changed and is much
more flexible now than before.
Mike W9MDB
On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 08:37:26 AM CDT, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
I propose that the option "Split operation" in the radio settings of
WSJT-X is renamed "Transmit harmonics prevention"
to remove some of the confusion to those who struggle with digital radio
technology.
The three options below should be "I don't care if I QRM the band", "Use
VFO B", and "Use CAT".
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
