------------------------- Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the June 17, 2004 issue of Workers World newspaper -------------------------
ASHCROFT, RIDGE AND MORE: THE RIFT COMES HOME
By Deirdre Griswold
Where will the axe fall next?
The Bush administration is riven by deep contradictions--and not only over its failed war to subjugate Iraq, which caused CIA Director George Tenet's head to roll at the beginning of June.
There is growing tension among the government agencies that deal with domestic policy, too--especially the many powerful organs of the capitalist state that employ growing armies of police of various kinds, trained to use force and violence to protect the status quo. The rift that appears to have opened up between Attorney General John Ashcroft and Homeland Security czar Tom Ridge is only a symptom of it.
Both foreign and domestic policy flow from the same source: the class relations of a given society. And those class relations are becoming shakier every day. No one can dispute that the gap is wider than ever in the United States between the fundamental classes--the shrinking group of capitalists who own and control the productive wealth of society, quite a few of whom have graduated from millionaires to billionaires, and the millions of workers whose economic well-being and prospects for the future become bleaker every day.
This sharp intensification of exploitation is bound to break out in a volcanic renewal of the class struggle. The only question is how soon it will start and how rapidly it will grow. There are already signs that many of the most oppressed workers--especially women and people of color- -are on the march.
ARMED MIGHT NOT ENOUGH
The thinking by the Bush administration that it could establish U.S. domination over the whole world with its superiority in military technology has run aground in Iraq because, in the long run, even military strength flows from politics, and not the other way around. And the political situation in Iraq has been fundamentally altered by the ongoing resistance of the Iraqi people--despite cruel repression by the well-armed occupying forces. The people's struggle let the air out of the Bush-Rumsfeld doctrine of world domination.
So when is the same lesson going to be applied here at home?
Ashcroft and Ridge are the two most visible figures representing the domestic structures of state repression: the Justice Department, which controls the courts, many of the prisons and the FBI; and the newly created Department of Homeland Security, which is supposed to bring under its umbrella all the agencies involved in responding to an internal crisis.
A rather bizarre incident recently showed that, despite professions of collaboration and mutual respect, there is deep animosity between these two.
On May 26, Ashcroft, with FBI Director John Mueller at his side, dramatically stepped before the television cameras to declare that "credible intelligence, from multiple sources, indicates that al-Qaeda plans to attempt an attack on the United States in the next few months." It was the type of announcement deliberately calculated to bolster George W. Bush's standing in the polls, which had been dropping with the Abu Ghraib torture scandal. The thinking undoubtedly was that a population made to feel they are in imminent danger will be more likely to accept brutality and criminal abuse inflicted by the authorities on presumed "suspects."
But, almost immediately, Ashcroft's announcement was challenged.
Ridge's Department of Homeland Security didn't elevate the national "threat warning" to red, or even orange. Instead, it remained at yellow, where it had been for months. And Ridge "seemed to downplay the warning in a series of interviews," said CBS News the next day. "There's not a consensus within the administration that we need to raise the threat level," Ridge said.
The powerful corporate media--which in many ways functions as an arm of the capitalist state, just as the church did in relation to the feudal state--more or less ridiculed Ash croft's grandstanding. It pointed out that local law enforcement hadn't been informed of any new threat and were shaking their heads in wonder.
Almost two weeks later, on June 8, Ashcroft testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which wanted to know about "a cascade of recently disclosed memorandums in which lawyers from his department as well as those from the Defense Department and other agencies provided legal arguments that inflicting pain in interrogating people detained in the fight against terrorism did not always constitute torture," wrote the New York Times on June 9.
When Ashcroft refused to hand over several of these memorandums, he was warned by two of the senators that he could be in contempt of Congress. One of them, Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, gave a pragmatic rather than moral or principled reason for not using torture. He said prohibitions on torture are intended to "protect my son in the military. That's why we have these treaties. So when Americans are captured, they are not tortured. That's the reason, in case anybody forgets it." Not a word about the suffering of the Iraqis and other people held in U.S. interrogation camps.
There is always rivalry among government bureaucracies competing for hegemony and funding. Capitalist politics is very largely a fight for spoils among factions competing to be blessed by the ruling class as its loyal servants. But they are supposed to keep the struggle out of sight, especially in "times of war"--or what the president and others deem to be war. They're not supposed to let the poisoned daggers out of their sheaths when cameras are grinding.
THE WAR AT HOME
Of course, none in the political establishment will ever point to the predatory ruling class as the real threat to the workers and oppressed peoples living in this country. More people die every day from preventable conditions--lack of health care, industrial pollution, accidents on the job, food contamination, and the chaotic and stressful personal and family relations that accompany economic insecurity and the objectification of women as property--than have died in all the so- called terrorist attacks. But no super-agency like the Department of Homeland Security has been created to deal with this very real terrorism of rampaging capitalism. The existing government agencies supposed to deal with these problems are woefully underfunded and virtually toothless.
It is also noteworthy that in this recent period a number of judges around the country have ruled as unconstitutional executive orders that allowed various police and military agencies to hold "suspects" indefinitely, without any due process of law.
The widening rifts in the Bush administration--first over foreign policy, now over domestic repression--are partly political in nature, using the narrow definition of that word. A national election is coming up and the party out of office sees the opportunity to take hold of the huge machinery of government, with its many opportunities for patronage and influence. Schemes and maneuvers to line up votes, like Ashcroft's move, are more likely to be exposed.
But that doesn't explain the struggles among Republican appointees--like Rums feld versus Powell, or Ashcroft versus Ridge. These struggles reflect the much deeper angst within the ruling class itself that its long ideological hold over the masses is loosening--both abroad and here at home.
Under it all are the involuntary economic processes by which capitalism generates profit--processes that are undermining the social stability of the system. The globalization of the labor market is bringing back home the wretched conditions of exploitation that a century ago generated a robust labor movement in this country, but were then exported as U.S. capital moved abroad. It is also bringing to these shores workers whose political awareness and militancy was shaped in countries oppressed and super-exploited by imperialism.
Politics, as Marx explained, is concentrated economics. The ruling class that is conducting a war for profit abroad is conducting the same war at home against the workers. There is no reason to think that the repressive machinery in the hands of Ashcroft and Ridge will be any more effective against the resistance of the workers than the Pentagon has been against the resistance of the Iraqi people. Quite the opposite.
- END -
(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe wwnews- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)
------------------ This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service. To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
